Relationships of Supervision

[Kittykat]

Would a relationship of supervision be better if the supervisor had a subtype towards the dominant function of his supervisee? For example, LII-Ne supervising IEE, IEE-Fi supervising ESI, etc?

[RSV3]

Would a relationship of supervision be better if the supervisor had a subtype towards the dominant function of his supervisee? For example, LII-Ne supervising IEE, IEE-Fi supervising ESI, etc?

best supervisory subtype pairs:
Any IM subtype paired to it's identical subtype (e.g., an Ne subtype paired with another Ne subtype)


average supervisory subtype pairs:

Ti with Ne or Se
Fi with Ne or Se
Te with Ni or Si
Fe with Ni or Si


and poor supervisory subtype pairs:

A Ti subtype paired with a Fi subtype
A Fe subtype paired with a Te subtype
A Ne subtype paired with a Se subtype
A Si subtype paired with a Ni subtype

This ordering is derived from one of the primary determinants of intertype compatibility: how much overlap of valued IMs is there between the two people. For example, with a Ne subtype paired with another Ne subtype, there will be substantial overlap of valued elements because both people with deeply value Ne and Si. Additionally, the pressure on the supervisee's PoLR will be somewhat alleviated due to the decreased strength of the supervisor's base function.

On the other hand, with a Ne and Se subtype pairing, there will be very little overlap of valued elements (there will be a small overlap at the Ti/Fe axis), thus resulting in less compatibility. Additionally, the pressure on the supervisee's PoLR function becomes more severe due to an increased strength (and probable use) of the supervisor's base function.