IEE' psychic energy more often flows outwards, whereas with EII, their psychic energy more often flows inward.
EII' energy levels tend to improve when they're alone whereas IEE' energy levels increase when they're interacting with larger groups.
IEE' energy levels tend to decrease when they're alone whereas EII' energy levels will decrease when they're interacting with larger groups of people.
With regards to energy levels, IEE tend to have higher energy levels than EII.
EII are more often focused on their thoughts and feelings where as IEE are more often focused on their surroundings.
IEE tend to be more active and initiating with others where as EII tend to be more passive and less initiating.
EII often have a smaller, closer network of friends where as IEE often have a wider network of friends.
IEE are often more cognizant of their outwards appearance and are thus better at presenting themselves than EII.
EII are generally better at concentrating on specific tasks for longer periods of time than IEE.
IEE often prefer to work with others in a team where as EII often prefer working alone.
EII tend to plan ahead, making decisions early. On the other hand, IEE tend to prefer a wait and see, more spontaneous approach.
IEE are relatively more flexible and tolerant than EII.
EII are relatively more rigid and stubborn than IEE.
IEE are comfortable making changes and adjustments to their decisions quite frequently. EII, on the other hand, prefer to not make changes to their decisions.
EII tend to put more effort than IEE into finishing any new project they start.
IEE tend to start more tasks and other projects than EII, but the IEE are less likely to complete all of them.
EII tend to have stiffer more angular movements. IEE tend to have more relaxed fluid movements.
IEE tend to have a more democratic leadership style than EII.
EII tend to have a more authoritarian, hierarchical leadership style than IEE.
IEE have a relatively higher stress tolerance than EII. EII often struggle with continually changing situations more than IEE do.
When planning to complete something, EII are more likely to focus their attention on the goal itself, overlooking and deprioritizing the individual actions needed to reach that goal. On the other hand, IEE tend to focus their attention on the each action; i.e., they're focused on how each decision and choice is being made (towards reaching the goal), in a step by step process.
IEE are able to change and make adjustments to their goals more easily than EII (depending on how progress is being made, etc.). EII on the other hand, prefer to stick with their original goals.
EII tend to judge their available options by how likely the option will help them reach their goal. If a choice no longer helps EII reach their goals, it will be dismissed and discontinued. On the other hand, IEE prefer to continue pursuing their current option, opting to adjust their ultimate goal in order to fit the current choice.
When solving a problem, EII rely more heavily on their generalized past experiences than IEE. EII are inclined to use already prepared, preformulated methods and processes to solve a problem.
When solving a problem, IEE are more inclined (than EII) to solve it by relying predominantly on only the presently available information. Essentially, IEE will develop a process or method uniquely fitted towards the present problem, and this method is designed using the present conditions and information.
IEE are more likely (than EII) to seek new and novel experiences rather than returning to something already lived through. They will generally only re-read a book, re-watch a movie, or revisit the same place if they have forgotten it or are hoping to learn something new from it.
EII are more likely than IEE to use "emotional anchors" that resonate with their internal emotional condition. These emotional anchors could be a book, a movie, a place, a song, etc. EII use these anchors to strengthen their inner emotional state and thus will repeat the experience: e.g., re-reading a book, re-watching a movie, continually going back to a place to experience the emotions associated with it.
IEE pay more particular attention to aspects of a situation or plan that are insufficient or lacking. This can be interpreted by others as IEE having a negative assessment of various situations and events (.e.g, "the glass is half empty). On the other hand, EII pay more attention to what is actually present in a situation, and this can be interpreted as an affirmative or positive manifestation of the surrounding world, situations, possibilities, and prospects (e.g. "the glass is half full").
When assessing an option or available choice, EII tend to focus more on how the choice could benefit them (what it would potentially yield) than IEE would. On the other hand, IEE would be more cognizant of the potential risks and potential losses that may accompany the decision that EII may unconsciously minimize.
When developing a plan of action or process, EII tend to see themselves as "within the process"; they are immersed in it. Often because of this, they have more difficulty managing several plans at once. On the other hand, IEE tend to place themselves "outside of the process"; they dissociate from it. For them the process or situation is something external from themselves.
When working on a project, IEE experience more discomfort (than EII) if the project does not have a clearly delineated end-goal or result. This happens because IEE have more difficulty monitoring and understanding how the project is developing than EII because they are outside of the process.
