LIE are more likely than SLI to perceive and distinguish themselves primarily through personal qualities. LIE focus on individualism more than SLI.
LIE attitude towards a specific person (more so than SLI) is based on their personal characteristics (authority, intellect, personal achievements, etc.) LIE recognize superiority of certain individuals drawing from their personal qualities
SLI, more than LIE, frequently perceives and defines themselves and other people through group associations. SLI focus on collectivism over individualism.
When SLI form opinions of others, these opinions are formed under the influence of their attitude towards the group to which the person belongs. To SLI, it is incomprehensible how it is possible to belong to two opposing groups at the same time:, i.e., "you're either with us, or with them and against us."
SLI are often able to form quicker opinions of others they have just met than LIE. This is based on the ability of SLI to draw conclusions about the person based on the groups the person belongs to; LIE are more reluctant to make these inferences.
LIE tend to plan ahead, making decisions early. On the other hand, SLI tend to prefer a wait and see, more spontaneous approach.
SLI are relatively more flexible and tolerant than LIE.
LIE are relatively more rigid and stubborn than SLI.
SLI are comfortable making changes and adjustments to their decisions quite frequently. LIE, on the other hand, prefer to not make changes to their decisions.
LIE tend to put more effort than SLI into finishing any new project they start.
SLI tend to start more tasks and other projects than LIE, but the SLI are less likely to complete all of them.
LIE tend to have stiffer more angular movements. SLI tend to have more relaxed fluid movements.
SLI tend to have a more democratic leadership style than LIE.
LIE tend to have a more authoritarian, hierarchical leadership style than SLI.
SLI have a relatively higher stress tolerance than LIE. LIE often struggle with continually changing situations more than SLI do.
LIE tend to be more idealistic with their heads-in-the-cloud. SLI, on the other hand, are more realistic and down-to-earth.
SLI are better at noticing details than LIE. LIE on the other hand, are better at seeing the big picture than SLI.
LIE are more focused on ideas and concepts than SLI. On the other hand, SLI are more focused (than LIE) on their surroundings.
SLI are more naturally comfortable with physical confrontations than LIE.
LIE are often more interested in the idea or theory of something, whereas SLI are more interested in the actual practice or implementation of it.
LIE are more likely (than SLI) to seek new and novel experiences rather than returning to something already lived through. They will generally only re-read a book, re-watch a movie, or revisit the same place if they have forgotten it or are hoping to learn something new from it.
SLI are more likely than LIE to use "emotional anchors" that resonate with their internal emotional condition. These emotional anchors could be a book, a movie, a place, a song, etc. SLI use these anchors to strengthen their inner emotional state and thus will repeat the experience: e.g., re-reading a book, re-watching a movie, continually going back to a place to experience the emotions associated with it.
SLI are rmore relaxed in their natural state than LIE. However SLI will mobilize and concentrate when needed to accomplish an objective. After the task has been completed, SLI demobilize again. This state of demobilization is the natural state of SLI.
When contemplating a task, it takes SLI longer time to mobilize than LIE; i.e., SLI prefer to spend some time in a more natural state of relaxedness which will then prepare them to subsequently mobilize and concentrate at the crucial moments, improving their performance.
When working on a project, SLI are more likely than LIE to break up larger tasks into several stages. Then SLI mobilize to carry out each stage (and demobilize between the stages).
When getting ready to start a project, SLI spend more time planning and preparing for the project than LIE. In particular, SLI spend more time discussing the plan, discussing options and ways to approach the project, etc.)
When describing their reasoning for their actions, SLI (more so than LIE) tend describe how and why they came to a certain decision, and focus less on the timing and initiation of the action.
When it comes to completing a task, LIE are more likely than SLI to mobilize for longer periods of time. Specifically, LIE tend to mobilize for an action early and stay mobilized for a longer period of time after the task has been completed. For LIE, this state of readiness is their natural state.
LIE are more likely than SLI to tackle a task in its entirety, rather than breaking it up into smaller separate stages.
When doing a task, LIE are inclined to work for the sake of the result (for example, a reward or bonus for completing the task). In contrast to SLI, LIE can renounce their comforts and conveniences for this; LIE evaluate their place of work by looking at what returns they get for the effort they invested (e.g., monetary, prestige, etc.).
When describing why they undertook a project, LIE are more likely than SLI to focus on the moment when a decision is made and to speak in detail about the stages of its implementation.
When discussing work, LIE are more likely than SLI to focus on the fruits of their labor, about what their effort will yield. SLI on the other hand are more likely to focus on the environment they work in, e.g., their work conditions, conveniences, commute time, etc.
LIE' psychic energy more often flows outwards, whereas with SLI, their psychic energy more often flows inward.
SLI' energy levels tend to improve when they're alone whereas LIE' energy levels increase when they're interacting with larger groups.
LIE' energy levels tend to decrease when they're alone whereas SLI' energy levels will decrease when they're interacting with larger groups of people.
With regards to energy levels, LIE tend to have higher energy levels than SLI.
SLI are more often focused on their thoughts and feelings where as LIE are more often focused on their surroundings.
LIE tend to be more active and initiating with others where as SLI tend to be more passive and less initiating.
SLI often have a smaller, closer network of friends where as LIE often have a wider network of friends.
LIE are often more cognizant of their outwards appearance and are thus better at presenting themselves than SLI.
SLI are generally better at concentrating on specific tasks for longer periods of time than LIE.
LIE often prefer to work with others in a team where as SLI often prefer working alone.
When conversing, LIE types are inclined to communicate in the form of monologues, where each party has "its turn." Because of that they subconsciously attempt to transform a dialogue into a series of monologues. Conversely, SLI tend to prefer more of a question and answer style format.
