LII are relatively better at assessing the emotional atmosphere occurring in a group or during an activity than LSE.
When meeting someone knew, LII are not as likely as LSE to perceive "getting to know somebody" as a special kind of activity. LII know very well whey they are getting acquainted (i.e., what the purpose of the relationship is, be it business, personal, travel, etc.). LII, in contrast with LSE, do not divide the process of getting acquainted into consecutive stages; rather LII immediately establish the necessary emotional distance in contact and can regulate it if needed. To bridge the gap between poorly acquainted people in a group LII amp up the emotional tone; this can be mutually experienced happiness or misfortune. The name and title of the person are of secondary relevance to LII and their relationship with the other person.
LSE are more likely to believe in objective truths than LII. That is, LSE are more likely to believe there is a correct or best way of doing something than LII.
LII are more inclined to believe there are relative truths than LSE. That is, this relativity is perceived by LII as an extenuation of the differing beliefs, opinions, intentions, etc. of each person.
When something is perceived by LSE as being incorrect, they are more likely (than LII) to tell the person who made the error what they did wrong and how to do it the right way. LSE are focused on who made the error and helping them to correct the mistake.
When something is perceived by LII as being incorrect, they are more likely (than LSE) to ask why it was done that way. Instead of necessarily trying to correct the person who made the error, LII attempt to understand the person's reason for their decision/action.
LSE tend to internally combine emotional exchanges with other activities rather than separating them out like LII. E.g., LSE see having fun occurring simultaneously with other activities, such as work or even serious affairs. LII are more likely to internally separate out having fun with other activities, although the two can be interchanged at a high frequency.
The "comparison and verification of concepts" is a more common phenomenon among LII than LSE. This comparison not only concerns LII methods, but also their understanding, terminology, etc. LII are attuned to the fact that different people might understand and interpret different concepts and terms differently. They perceive terminology as well as actions of other people as part of the subjective concept inseparable from personal opinion, position, intent, etc. In contrast to LSE who perceive terminology as "objective," LII understand personal differences behind terminology (this applies even to well established terms) and they attempt to compare and verify them.
LSE are not as inclined to compare and verify concepts as LII. LSE assume that these can have only one unique interpretation (the "correct" interpretation), and LSE often do not think about the fact that the other person may be interpreting them differently. Much more than LII, LSE apply concepts such as "objective reality," "unequivocal facts," and de-emphasize concepts; LSE consider that they know the "right" way of doing things, how something "truly is," etc.
LSE are more likely (than LII) to use special rituals or other culturally accepted formalities when forming relationships with others. What that means is that the emotional proximity and relationship status for LSE be more externally predetermined. Additionally, LSE generally progress in relationships through stages, and therefore are more familiar with these stages than LII. LSE tend to be more linear in their relationship progression than LII, and LSE assign importance to the formalities of recognizing the start and end to each of these stages.
LII are more likely than LSE to perceive and distinguish themselves primarily through personal qualities. LII focus on individualism more than LSE.
LII attitude towards a specific person (more so than LSE) is based on their personal characteristics (authority, intellect, personal achievements, etc.) LII recognize superiority of certain individuals drawing from their personal qualities
LSE, more than LII, frequently perceives and defines themselves and other people through group associations. LSE focus on collectivism over individualism.
When LSE form opinions of others, these opinions are formed under the influence of their attitude towards the group to which the person belongs. To LSE, it is incomprehensible how it is possible to belong to two opposing groups at the same time:, i.e., "you're either with us, or with them and against us."
LSE are often able to form quicker opinions of others they have just met than LII. This is based on the ability of LSE to draw conclusions about the person based on the groups the person belongs to; LII are more reluctant to make these inferences.
LSE' psychic energy more often flows outwards, whereas with LII, their psychic energy more often flows inward.
LII' energy levels tend to improve when they're alone whereas LSE' energy levels increase when they're interacting with larger groups.
LSE' energy levels tend to decrease when they're alone whereas LII' energy levels will decrease when they're interacting with larger groups of people.
With regards to energy levels, LSE tend to have higher energy levels than LII.
LII are more often focused on their thoughts and feelings where as LSE are more often focused on their surroundings.
LSE tend to be more active and initiating with others where as LII tend to be more passive and less initiating.
LII often have a smaller, closer network of friends where as LSE often have a wider network of friends.
LSE are often more cognizant of their outwards appearance and are thus better at presenting themselves than LII.
LII are generally better at concentrating on specific tasks for longer periods of time than LSE.
LSE often prefer to work with others in a team where as LII often prefer working alone.
LII tend to be more idealistic with their heads-in-the-cloud. LSE, on the other hand, are more realistic and down-to-earth.
LSE are better at noticing details than LII. LII on the other hand, are better at seeing the big picture than LSE.
LII are more focused on ideas and concepts than LSE. On the other hand, LSE are more focused (than LII) on their surroundings.
LSE are more naturally comfortable with physical confrontations than LII.
LII are often more interested in the idea or theory of something, whereas LSE are more interested in the actual practice or implementation of it.
LII tend to perceive events in an episodic manner, i.e., they see events evolve in discrete states rather than continuous changes. On the other hand, LSE tend to perceive events in a continuous sequence; i.e., they see events evolving fluidly rather that one state to the next.
When describing the stages of an event, LSE are more likely to focus on how stage A leads to stage B, how stage B leads to stage C, etc. LII, on the other hand, focus more on the stages themselves without necessarily seeing or emphasizing the transitions or causes and effects of the stages to the extent that LSE do.
When describing reality, LII are more likely to talk about the properties and structure of reality. LSE are more likely to describe reality as movements, interactions, and changes.
When planning to complete something, LII are more likely to focus their attention on the goal itself, overlooking and deprioritizing the individual actions needed to reach that goal. On the other hand, LSE tend to focus their attention on the each action; i.e., they're focused on how each decision and choice is being made (towards reaching the goal), in a step by step process.
LSE are able to change and make adjustments to their goals more easily than LII (depending on how progress is being made, etc.). LII on the other hand, prefer to stick with their original goals.
LII tend to judge their available options by how likely the option will help them reach their goal. If a choice no longer helps LII reach their goals, it will be dismissed and discontinued. On the other hand, LSE prefer to continue pursuing their current option, opting to adjust their ultimate goal in order to fit the current choice.
When developing a plan of action or process, LSE tend to see themselves as "within the process"; they are immersed in it. Often because of this, they have more difficulty managing several plans at once. On the other hand, LII tend to place themselves "outside of the process"; they dissociate from it. For them the process or situation is something external from themselves.
When working on a project, LII experience more discomfort (than LSE) if the project does not have a clearly delineated end-goal or result. This happens because LII have more difficulty monitoring and understanding how the project is developing than LSE because they are outside of the process.
